In other thoughts, I've been thinking of renaming Category:Eco-terrorists to Category:Environmental vigilantes, not just because "eco-terrorist" is a loaded term, but because there is no Category:Terrorists and any particular character's inclusion in that category could be considered contentious as it is an equally loaded term. I mean, we could create Category:Terrorists, as there are a few characters who very much fit that label (C.R.A.P. from Mirage, Old Hob and Man Ray with the mutagen bomb, etc.), but so many other potential examples could be considered a topic of debate or worse. It's worth noting that, while "terrorist" was already a somewhat loaded term back in the 1990s and earlier but with an otherwise fairly clearly-understood definition, it became vastly more loaded a term after 2001. However, if we come up with clearly-defined parameters for inclusion in these categories (especially those derived from mainstream scholarly definitions) and moderate them accordingly, it might not be any big deal at all.
Yeah, I'm cool with albino characters. Not sold on changing eco-terrorists right at the moment... I know the old "one person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter" but I feel like there could be a very clear distinction, especially in these works of fiction, and especially with the clarification on the Category description.