Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26516813-20190711012913/@comment-995426-20190916211301

Again, interesting if true, but this is the first I'm hearing of it. If we are to add any of these details to the wiki's articles, we still need sources, and skeptical readers will also want sources. Those sources can be references from publications (including show title, book title, episode name, issue number, page number, etc., where relevant and helpful), or they can be links to information on the internet (including press releases, social media postings, articles, interviews, videos), as long as this information can be verified as genuine. That's what I mean when I say we need sources.

I mean, discussion and gossip can be good and fun, but we're also still a wiki. Sometimes it's not enough to just say you have a source or to say something you said you heard or read somewhere, because then that's not a reliable source&mdash;it's hearsay. A reliable source is something we can check out and examine for ourselves.