Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31255465-20170923034221/@comment-33336503-20171017223616

Easol1 wrote: TMNTInsighter wrote: Give me the in-episode evidence that proves the arc was unofficial, I'm waiting! In-episode evidence ALONE is not required except by you; those are YOUR highly-restrictive standards for canonicity, not the rest of the world's (I can provide other similar examples of determined canonicity if you like). I'm not sure why you're not satisfied by me saying that you can enjoy the arc as whatever you like.

And unless I'm mistaken, we've already gone over the issues that make it impossible for it to exist in the same timeline as the main series unless you headcanon in a bunch of twisting, complicated explanations or excuses to fill the massive, contradictory holes. Issues such as contradictory information/events that makes it impossible for characters (Renet, for instance), events or scenarios to co-exist in the same world. They are effectively mutually exclusive.

So two wrongs make a right?! Give me a break!

Easol1 wrote: That is evidence. You simply stated that you don't consider these massive contradictions to be anything important, because some other continuity error that DIDN'T derail the entire world and multiple characters (such as making characters' very existence and stated events impossible) bugged you in a different episode. There is in-series evidence, but you're not acknowledging it.

So I don't see any reason to repeat myself more than I already have. Have a nice day.

So anything that's ever been made that has continuity errors in it never happened?! Pfffft!

Just call things the way you see them on the screen! That's the way it's always been and the way it always should be; don't rely on the creator, some jerk writer like Auman, some page, or anything outside the episode as it plays to tell you what to think and conclude! And if you can't name me any in-episode evidence that proves this arc never happened, then you can't say it didn't happen. It's as simple as that.