Talk:Carmageddon!/@comment-26761322-20171113160941/@comment-33165688-20171127131400

Nerdlet, same thoughts here about how it doesn't fit. I've seen some people trying to explain how it totally makes sense (including bringing in details from other Turtles properties like the comics), but none of them have managed.

I also don't see it as canon because, simply, despite all the rotten treatment of it by Nick, they still are the ultimate authority on canonicity. Not so much a matter of "who would you like to determine canon, a company or a person?" and more "who actually does, regardless of what we like?" That sort of thing lies with whoever has intellectual property over a work/franchise, and has been demonstrated many times (Star Wars, Lord of the Rings... and yes, Ninja Turtles, as Peter Laird said that the canonicity of certain Mirage stories was entirely the domain of Viacom and not him).

Thank you for your insights.